Featured Post

The Science of Getting Rich: CHAPTER VII [excerpt] by Wallace D. Wattles #Gratitude

--- Gratitude THE ILLUSTRATIONS GIVEN IN THE LAST CHAPTER will have conveyed to the reader the fact that the first step toward getting ...

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Consumer watchdog on a shorter leash

Click here for link to source post

It seems powerful financial elites are no where near giving up the ship just yet. This sort of thing clearly SHOWS just how much this debt based ponzi scheme economy depends on financial firms retaining the ability to rip off consumers with endless fine print giving every option to the corporation and absolutely none to the consumer while peddling sub-prime predatory loans and inflicting usury on as many Americans as is possible. Without this ability, obviously, our financial system would quickly collapse.

Agency's powers curbed awaiting Senate approval of new director nominee

By Jim Puzzanghera, Tribune Washington Bureau
July 19, 2011

The federal government's new agency to protect consumers from financial fraud opens Thursday with a new director nominee on deck, but it won't be quite the aggressive watchdog promised a year ago.

Because of political squabbling, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will launch without an appointed director. And the lack of leadership has consequences.

The agency won't have power to crack down on mortgage brokers, some of which helped lead the nation into the housing debacle four years ago. It also won't have authority over payday lenders and remittance companies, the other largely unregulated sectors of the financial services industry that it was created to police.

"It's very disappointing that the centerpiece of the president's financial reform agenda is not ready to hit the ground running," said Travis Plunkett, legislative director for the Consumer Federation of America.

Republicans and much of the financial services industry vehemently opposed the agency and stalled efforts by the Obama administration to install a director, a five-year appointment that must be confirmed by the Senate.

The White House announced Sunday that Obama had decided to bypass Elizabeth Warren, the liberal Harvard law professor who has spent nearly a year organizing the sprawling agency and hiring staff but who was seen as too controversial to be confirmed by the Senate. Obama instead nominated former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray, who had been hired by Warren to be head of enforcement for the agency.

But Republicans say they will oppose any nominee unless Obama agrees to changes in the structure of the agency. With the agency formally opening for business Thursday, there is not enough time to put a director in place, even one who had broad support. And without one, the agency legally cannot exercise expanded consumer protection powers Congress granted it in last year's financial regulatory overhaul to try to prevent another crisis, government officials said.

Besides being unable to use its authority to regulate mortgage brokers and other financial firms outside the conventional banking industry, the agency initially will be denied broad authority to prohibit "unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices" or to issue rules requiring better disclosures of the terms of financial products, the inspectors general of the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve determined.

The consumer bureau still will have plenty of other powers to exercise. The agency immediately will take over from banking regulators the authority to enforce 18 consumer protection laws that existed before last year's financial overhaul. Those include rules governing credit cards and oversight of mortgage servicers.

Some banks aren't happy that they will face oversight, while competitors such as payday lenders initially won't.

"One of the purposes of the (legislation) was to have a level playing field, and that certainly will not be accomplished," said Richard Hunt, president of the Consumer Bankers Association. Visiting a bank in Tupelo, Miss., recently, Hunt said he counted 14 payday lenders in a mile stretch.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., one of the architects of the financial regulatory overhaul, said the agency's situation wasn't a major problem — yet.

"A month without raising the debt limit would be a disaster," he said. "A month of not adopting new rules for check cashing, not a disaster."

But Frank said that if the agency remains without an appointed head for "many more months," he would be "very disappointed."

Warren acknowledged the limited initial authority, telling lawmakers last week that when the consumer agency has its director and fully operational powers, it will be "a very good day."

Some Republican lawmakers, who opposed the creation of the agency, said it should not get any power until it has a Senate-confirmed director.

"I think everybody's still very much in a wait-and-see mode, and we're running up against a deadline without somebody to give the direction that's needed," said Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., who introduced legislation blocking the transfer of all powers to the agency until it has a director.

Capito and nearly every other Republican in Congress opposed the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, arguing it would restrict access to credit by average Americans. Banks opposed the agency as well, saying it made no sense to remove consumer protection from the oversight of banking regulators who could balance it with the health of financial firms.

Warren, who specializes in consumer bankruptcy, argued that those regulators made consumer protection a low priority. In 2007, she proposed creating an agency to protect consumers from bad loans and other financial products.

The idea quickly was embraced by consumer advocates and the Obama administration, who made it the focal point of the most sweeping rewrite of financial regulations since the Great Depression. They charged that existing federal regulators put bank profits ahead of consumer protection in the years leading up to the subprime-market meltdown.

Warren appeared the obvious choice for the agency's powerful director. But strong Republican opposition made the White House nervous that the nomination would be filibustered in the Senate, preventing Warren from playing any role in organizing the agency.

So in September, Obama appointed Warren to dual White House and Treasury adviser positions that did not require Senate confirmation. Under the law, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is responsible for launching the agency and would exercise its authority until a director was confirmed.

Geithner delegated the job to Warren, who has been hiring staff, meeting with bankers and consumer groups, and readying the agency for operations.

In May, nearly all Republican Senators vowed to block any nominee for the job unless the administration made major changes to the agency's structure, including replacing the director with a five-member bipartisan commission.

White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said Obama will continue to oppose any efforts like these "that weaken the agency and hurt American consumers."

Obama could install Cordray without confirmation during the next Senate recess, a controversial practice known as a recess appointment. But Republicans have tried to prevent such appointments for the consumer agency and other key vacant positions by blocking the Senate from going into a formal recess.

The consumer bureau could run for a short time without an appointed director, but that will slow it from addressing long-standing holes in consumer protection, said the Consumer Federation's Plunkett.

"Not having a director merely pushes the agency back further," he said. "It's like holding the runner at the beginning of a race. It's going to make it harder for the runner to catch up."

Copyright © 2011, Chicago Tribune

No comments:

Post a Comment