Featured Post

The Science of Getting Rich: CHAPTER VII [excerpt] by Wallace D. Wattles #Gratitude

--- Gratitude THE ILLUSTRATIONS GIVEN IN THE LAST CHAPTER will have conveyed to the reader the fact that the first step toward getting ...

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Considering a NEW #investment strategy! #FX #forex #market

---

I do consider myself a full time professional forex trader after having traded the FX market on a daily basis for about 4 or 5 years now..

Is it a tough game?

F'ing A! After 4 years of studying, learning and trading forex I always seem to feel extremely lucky to come out B/E over any extended period of time.

I have traded equity markets regularly since 1998 and I made fiat doing it.. Quite a bit as I was able to find market / broker inefficiencys. (See I found an Edge (or two) in 2004 - #Market & #Stupid #Brokers)

Here are some forex trading facts as found on Wikipedia

Foreign exchange fraud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Foreign exchange fraud is any trading scheme used to defraud traders by convincing them that they can expect to gain a high profit by trading in the foreign exchange market. Currency trading "has become the fraud du jour" as of early 2008, according to Michael Dunn of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.[1] But "the market has long been plagued by swindlers preying on the gullible," according to the New York Times.[2] "The average individual foreign-exchange-trading victim loses about $15,000, according to CFTC records" according to The Wall Street Journal.[3] The North American Securities Administrators Association says that "off-exchange forex trading by retail investors is at best extremely risky, and at worst, outright fraud."[4]

"In a typical case, investors may be promised tens of thousands of dollars in profits in just a few weeks or months, with an initial investment of only $5,000. Often, the investor’s money is never actually placed in the market through a legitimate dealer, but simply diverted – stolen – for the personal benefit of the con artists."[5]

In August, 2008 the CFTC set up a special task force to deal with growing foreign exchange fraud.[6] In January 2010, the CFTC proposed new rules limiting leverage to 10 to 1, based on " a number of improper practices" in the retail foreign exchange market, "among them solicitation fraud, a lack of transparency in the pricing and execution of transactions, unresponsiveness to customer complaints, and the targeting of unsophisticated, elderly, low net worth and other vulnerable individuals."[7]

The foreign exchange market is at best a zero–sum game,[8] meaning that whatever one trader gains, another loses. However, brokerage commissions and other transaction costs are subtracted from the results of all traders, making foreign exchange a negative-sum game.
Frauds might include churning of customer accounts for the purpose of generating commissions, selling software that is supposed to guide the customer to large profits,[9] improperly managed "managed accounts",[10] false advertising,[11] Ponzi schemes and outright fraud.[4][12] It also refers to any retail forex broker who indicates that trading foreign exchange is a low risk, high profit investment.[13]

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which loosely regulates the foreign exchange market in the United States, has noted an increase in the amount of unscrupulous activity in the non-bank foreign exchange industry.[14]
An official of the National Futures Association was quoted as saying, "Retail forex trading has increased dramatically over the past few years. Unfortunately, the amount of forex fraud has also increased dramatically."[15] Between 2001 and 2006 the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has prosecuted more than 80 cases involving the defrauding of more than 23,000 customers who lost $350 million. From 2001 to 2007, about 26,000 people lost $460 million in forex frauds.[1] CNN quoted Godfried De Vidts, President of the Financial Markets Association, a European body, as saying, "Banks have a duty to protect their customers and they should make sure customers understand what they are doing. Now if people go online, on non-bank portals, how is this control being done?"

The foreign exchange market is a zero sum game[8] in which there are many experienced well-capitalized professional traders (e.g. working for banks) who can devote their attention full time to trading. An inexperienced retail trader will have a significant information disadvantage compared to these traders.

Retail traders are - almost by definition - undercapitalized. Thus they are subject to the problem of gambler's ruin. In a "Fair Game" (one with no information advantages) between two players that continues until one trader goes bankrupt, the player with the lower amount of capital has a higher probability of going bankrupt first. Since the retail speculator is effectively playing against the market as a whole - which has nearly infinite capital - he will almost certainly go bankrupt. The retail trader always pays the bid/ask spread which makes his odds of winning less than those of a fair game. Additional costs may include margin interest, or if a spot position is kept open for more than one day the trade may be "resettled" each day, each time costing the full bid/ask spread.

Although it is possible for a few experts to successfully arbitrage the market for an unusually large return, this does not mean that a larger number could earn the same returns even given the same tools, techniques and data sources. This is because the arbitrages are essentially drawn from a pool of finite size; although information about how to capture arbitrages is a nonrival good, the arbitrages themselves are a rival good. (To draw an analogy, the total amount of buried treasure on an island is the same, regardless of how many treasure hunters have bought copies of the treasure map.)

According to the Wall Street Journal (Currency Markets Draw Speculation, Fraud July 26, 2005) "Even people running the trading shops warn clients against trying to time the market. 'If 15% of day traders are profitable,' says Drew Niv, chief executive of FXCM, 'I'd be surprised.' "[16]

Paul Belogour, the Managing Director of a Boston based retail forex trader, was quoted by the Financial Times as saying, "Trading foreign exchange is an excellent way for investors to find out how tough the markets really are. But I say to customers: if this is money you have worked hard for – that you cannot afford to lose – never, never invest in foreign exchange." [17]
[edit]

The use of high leverage

By offering high leverage, the market maker encourages traders to trade extremely large positions. This increases the trading volume cleared by the market maker and increases his profits, but increases the risk that the trader will receive a margin call. While professional currency dealers (banks, hedge funds) seldom use more than 10:1 leverage, retail clients may be offered leverage between 50:1 and 200:1.[2]

A self-regulating body for the foreign exchange market, the National Futures Association, warns traders in a forex training presentation of the risk in trading currency. “As stated at the beginning of this program, off-exchange foreign currency trading carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all customers. The only funds that should ever be used to speculate in foreign currency trading, or any type of highly speculative investment, are funds that represent risk capital; in other words, funds you can afford to lose without affecting your financial situation.“ [18]

---

And here is a little research I did this morning..

Slot Machine Payout Percentages

Various ways of describing the house edge on gambling games are traditionally used. With table games like roulette, blackjack, or craps, the house edge is normally expressed as a percentage. For example, blackjack has a house edge of between 0.5% and 1% when played with perfect basic strategy. That means out of every $100 bet, the player can expect to lose between $0.50 and $1.00. (This is a long term expectation, and in the short term, anything can happen.)

But slot machines are normally described according to their payout percentages. The payout percentage is basically what percentage of money will get paid out compared to what is wagered. A slot machine with a payout percentage of 99.5%, for example, would pay out $99.50 for every $100 wagered. (Again, this is over the long term.)

Slot Machine Hold Percentages

A slot machine's hold percentage is the amount of money the house can expect to win over the long term. This number is determined by subtracting the payout percentage from 100%. So a slot machine with a 96% payout percentage has a 4% hold percentage.

The hold percentage on a slot machine is the same thing as the house edge on a table game. The only difference is the term used to describe it.

Typical Slot Machine Payouts and Payout Percentages

A typical slot machine payout percentage varies according to what area of the country you're in. Slot machine payouts also vary based on what denomination of slot machine you're playing. Usually, the more active a casino destination is, the higher the slot machine payouts are. And the higher denomination games usually have a higher payout percentage than the lower denomination slot machine games.

For example, in August 2006, the slot machine payouts at the Trump Plaza in Atlantic City looked something like this:

Quarter slots - 92.6%
Dollar slots - 93.3%
Five dollar slots - 97.3%
(That information is according to Strictly Slots magazine.)

Cost Per Hour

Some authors, like Andrew Brisman, who wrote The American Mensa Guide to Casino Gambling, find it useful to look at the expected loss per hour of a particular gambling game. It's a simple calculation. You take the average number of bets per hour, multiple that by the amount being wagered, and then multiple that by the house edge or hold percentage. That's the expected loss per hour.

For example, in roulette, most players are going to get in 65 bets per hour. Assuming you're playing for $5 per bet, your total amount wagered per hour will be $325. Since roulette has a house edge of about 5.2%. So a roulette player's expected loss per hour is $16.90. (And keep in mind that's a long term expectation. In the short term, anything can happen.)

Most slot players make about 100 spins per hour. So using the examples above, a slots player can expect to lose the following amounts per hour at the Trump Plaza in Atlantic City:

On the quarter slots, the player will be wagering $125/hour. (Assuming the player is playing a five coin max bet, which is typical.) The player can expect to lose 7.4% of that, or $9.25.

On the dollar slots, the player will be wagering $500/hour. (Again assuming a five coin max bet per spin.) She can expect to lose 6.7% of that, or $33.50, per hour.

One the five dollar slots, the player wagers $2500/hour assuming a five coin max bet. She can expet to lose 2.7% of this, or $67.50 per hour.

So even though the percentage return on the higher denomination machines is better, the amount of money it will cost you to play on each spin will often still be higher.

How Do You Know What a Specific Slot Machine's Payout Percentage Is?

I offer a short answer to that question: You can't. The casinos don't make this information available, and the number of spins to estimate an accurate percentage would be dramatically high. Even after 4000 spins, you couldn't be entirely sure that your calculations were accurate because of the effect of the big jackpots. And 4000 spins would take 40 hours of play.

Copyright 2008, Slot Machine Strategy. All Rights Reserved.
Contact Us

---

I'm telling you that I am considering closing out my forex account completely and taking the f'ing fiat to a local casino and playing 5.00 slots..

I feel like, after 4 or 5 years of working my f'ing ASS off at trading forex, that I can greatly increase my odds of winning by hitting the 5.00 slots with my fiat.

Greg

1 comment:

  1. Greg, it sounds to me like you should read "Bird Watching in Lion Country": http://www.dirkdutoit.com/blog/?page_id=285

    Seriously, read it.

    ReplyDelete